GegoSoft Technologies · Madurai, India · Established 2017
Software engineering services
Build with AI, ship with confidence.
We are an outsourced engineering team. You get named engineers, two-week sprints and an API contract agreed before anyone writes a screen. All 18 engineers here use Claude Code as daily tooling — AI drafts, scaffolds and reviews, and a person decides what merges. Fourteen service lines below, one delivery model behind all of them.
- Engagement
- Dedicated team, fixed-scope project, or extension of a product we already run
- Cadence
- Two-week sprints, a working demo at the end of every one
- Contract
- API-first — the interface is specified before the UI is built
- Tooling
- Claude Code across the team, on every project, every day
GegoSoft engineering services, in six facts
Updated 2026- What this is
- Fourteen engineering, design and growth service lines delivered by a single team from Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
- Company
- GegoSoft Technologies (OPC) Private Limited, a software development company established in 2017.
- Team and stack
- 18 engineers working in React, Next.js, NestJS, MongoDB, Laravel, Flutter and Kotlin.
- Engagement models
- A dedicated team billed monthly, a fixed-scope project priced after wireframe approval, or customisation of one of our six production products.
- How delivery works
- Wireframes are approved before backend work starts. Work ships in two-week sprints with a demo you can click at the end of each.
- Where clients are
- India, the United States, Australia, Europe and Dubai. Work is delivered remotely from Madurai.
Build with AI
AI writes a great deal of our code. None of it ships unread.
Every engineer here runs Claude Code as standard tooling. That is not a pilot or an innovation programme — it is how the work gets done. What it changes is speed and coverage. What it does not change is who is accountable for the result.
What AI does here
- Scaffolds modules, migrations and boilerplate
- Generates test cases, including the edge cases people skip
- Triages static analysis output and flags real problems
- Refactors legacy code with the tests already in place
- Keeps API and code documentation current as work lands
- Runs a first review pass before a human reviewer opens the diff
What AI does not do here
- Approve a merge — a named engineer does that
- Choose the architecture or the database
- Deploy anything to production
- Decide what should be built in the first place
- Talk to your users or interpret their behaviour
- Take responsibility when something breaks
The practical effect is that a two-person team now covers what used to take four, and the review standard went up rather than down. The longer version, including what we measure and where AI has actively made things worse, is on our AI-assisted software development page.
You are hiring a team, not buying hours.
Outsourcing fails when the vendor is treated as a black box and the client is treated as a ticket queue. We work the other way: you meet the engineers, you set the priorities each sprint, and the code sits in your repository from the first commit.
Dedicated team
MonthlyNamed engineers assigned to you and no one else. You reprioritise sprint by sprint. Right when the roadmap will keep moving for months and scope is expected to change.
Fixed-scope project
Priced after wireframesScope is frozen once wireframes are approved, then priced and dated. Right for a defined build — a portal, a migration, a first release of a product.
Product extension
Start from working softwareBegin from one of the six platforms we build and run ourselves, then customise. Right when most of what you need already exists and the argument is about the remainder.
What does not change, whichever model you choose
- Your repository, your infrastructure, your IP
- The same engineers for the length of the engagement
- Two-week sprints and a demo at the end of each
- A written status note every week, not a dashboard
- Direct access to the people writing the code
- Handover documentation written as we go, not at the end
Two weeks, then something you can click.
We run two-week sprints because that is short enough to correct a wrong assumption and long enough to finish something. We do not run story-point estimation theatre, and we do not hold a daily stand-up that exists to be reported upwards. The test of a sprint is whether there is working software at the end of it.
- Monday, week oneA sprint plan listing exactly what is being attempted and what is deliberately not.
- Mid-sprintA short written note if anything has changed — a blocker, a discovery, a decision needed from you.
- Friday, week twoA demo link on a real environment, plus a changelog in plain language.
- ContinuouslyAccess to the repository and the issue tracker. Nothing is staged for your benefit.
A small stack we know deeply, not a long list to look capable.
Technology choice is an architecture decision, and it belongs to an engineer who has to maintain the result. We pick from a deliberately narrow set, and we write down why. If your requirement is genuinely better served by something we do not use, we will say so rather than bend it into Laravel.
- Backend
- Laravel NestJS PHP TypeScript Node.js
- Front end
- React Next.js Tailwind CSS Livewire Alpine.js
- Mobile
- Flutter Kotlin
- Data
- MySQL PostgreSQL MongoDB Redis
- Infrastructure
- AWS Google Cloud Firebase Cloudflare Docker
- Content and commerce
- WordPress WooCommerce Headless WordPress
- Blockchain
- Solidity EVM chains Ethers.js
- Engineering tooling
- Claude Code Git CI pipelines Static analysis
The wireframe is the contract before the code is.
Now that software is quick to build, the expensive mistake is building the wrong thing quickly. So nothing goes to the backend team until the screens are agreed. This is the sequence on every project, and it is genuinely a sequence — each step depends on the one before it.
Wireframes, in Photoshop or straight in HTML
Real screens with real field names, not a mood board. If a form has 31 fields, the wireframe shows 31 fields.
Reviewed with your project manager and your CEO
Both, in the same conversation. Operational detail and commercial intent rarely agree on the first pass, and it is much cheaper to find that out here.
Frozen, and the estimate is built against it
A fixed price without a frozen wireframe is a guess. Once the screens are signed off, the number means something.
Backend supplies APIs against the approved screens
The data model follows what users actually need to see and do, rather than the interface being negotiated down to fit a schema someone drew first.
Mobile is built after the web functionality settles
Building both at once means paying twice for every change of mind. The mobile app consumes the same API, so the delay costs very little.
Interface work is covered in more depth on user experience design and responsive web design.
One API, several consumers, no rewrite when the second one arrives.
We define the API contract before the interface is built. Endpoints, payloads, authentication and permissions are specified and documented first, then the web application, the mobile app and any third-party integration all consume the same contract. Permissions live at the API layer, not in the screen — so hiding a button is never mistaken for security.
The practical payoff comes later: adding a mobile app, a partner integration or a customer-facing portal in year two is a new client against an existing API, not a restart of the project.
The service lines
Fourteen ways that model gets applied.
Grouped by what you are trying to achieve rather than by technology. Every line below is delivered by the same team, on the same cadence, under the same engagement models.
Build a product
04 service linesPlatform and framework engineering
04 service linesInterface and experience
02 service linesReach and growth
01 service lineBlockchain and Web3 engineering
03 service linesWe take on blockchain work as engineering. We do not build multi-level marketing systems, high-yield investment programmes, or any platform whose product is a promised return.
Nothing is billed until the scope is written down.
A conversation
Thirty to sixty minutes about the problem, the users and the constraints. Usually with an engineer present, not only a salesperson.
A written scope note
Our understanding of what you need, what we would recommend building first, and what we would leave out. Free, and yours to take elsewhere.
Wireframes and an estimate
Screens taken to sign-off, then a price and a date built against them. This is where a fixed-scope engagement becomes real.
Sprint one
Repository set up in your account, environments provisioned, and the first demo two weeks later.
Before you enquire
Four situations where we are the wrong choice.
Saying this early saves both of us a fortnight. If any of these describe your position, another supplier will serve you better.
- You want a fixed price before scope exists We will not quote a number against a paragraph. We will produce wireframes first, and only then commit to a price and a date.
- You need an onsite team We work remotely from Madurai for clients in India, the USA, Australia, Europe and Dubai. We do not place engineers at client premises.
- The platform's product is a promised return No MLM structures, no high-yield investment programmes, no speculative-investment schemes. This is a settled position, not a negotiation.
- The decision is the lowest quote There is always a cheaper offer, and often a much cheaper one. If price is the deciding factor rather than one of several, take it.
Common questions
Questions buyers ask before the first call.
What does an AI-assisted software development company actually mean?
At GegoSoft it means all 18 engineers use Claude Code as daily tooling on every project. AI handles scaffolding, test generation, static analysis triage, refactoring, documentation and a first review pass. It does not approve merges, choose architecture or deploy to production — a named engineer does each of those. The difference shows up as more test coverage and faster delivery, not as fewer people being accountable.
Which engagement model should I choose?
GegoSoft offers three. Choose a dedicated team when the roadmap will keep moving and priorities will change month to month. Choose a fixed-scope project when the requirement is defined enough to wireframe and freeze. Choose product extension when one of the six platforms GegoSoft already runs covers most of what you need, and the work is the remainder.
Who owns the code and the intellectual property?
The client does. Work is committed to the client's own repository from the first sprint, infrastructure is provisioned in the client's accounts, and handover documentation is written as the project proceeds rather than assembled at the end. There is no proprietary framework that has to be licensed afterwards.
What does API-first mean for a project I am paying for?
It means the interface contract — endpoints, payloads, authentication and permissions — is specified and documented before the user interface is built. Web, mobile and any third-party integration then consume the same contract. The commercial benefit arrives later: adding a mobile app or a partner integration in year two is a new client against an existing API rather than a rebuild.
How long before I see working software?
GegoSoft runs two-week sprints, and there is a demo on a live environment at the end of every sprint. The first demo is normally two weeks after sprint one begins. Before that there is a wireframe stage, which typically takes one to three weeks depending on how many screens need sign-off.
Where is GegoSoft based and where do its clients come from?
GegoSoft Technologies (OPC) Private Limited is based in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India and was established in 2017. Work is delivered remotely to clients in India, the United States, Australia, Europe and Dubai.
Tell us what is not working yet.
A first conversation costs nothing and usually ends with a written scope note you can take anywhere — including to another supplier. That is a fair trade for finding out whether we are a fit.